<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Quality Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/wikipedia-quality-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/wikipedia-quality-sucks/</link>
	<description>Opinion from Silicon Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Furrier</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/wikipedia-quality-sucks/#comment-29325</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/wikipedia-quality-sucks/#comment-29325</guid>
		<description>Todd,
I agree with you which is why I say force a user registration and public idenity model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,<br />
I agree with you which is why I say force a user registration and public idenity model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/wikipedia-quality-sucks/#comment-29324</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/09/17/wikipedia-quality-sucks/#comment-29324</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree at all, the problem isn&#039;t the anonymous entries so much as it is the people on wiki who have no lives, and at the same time, no knowledge of the subject matter they are deleting and remarking upon.  

It doesn&#039;t matter how many OTHER articles someone has contributed to, the basic structure of wiki is based on false premises.

If anything, the more articles you have edited, the less you should be allowed TO edit.  Wiki keeps all the edits, so just go back and look at the poor mediation wiki has done, the favoritism, the palpable bias, it isn&#039;t a &quot;community&quot;, it is a mob.  

And like most mobs, it isn&#039;t very intelligent or rational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree at all, the problem isn&#8217;t the anonymous entries so much as it is the people on wiki who have no lives, and at the same time, no knowledge of the subject matter they are deleting and remarking upon.  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how many OTHER articles someone has contributed to, the basic structure of wiki is based on false premises.</p>
<p>If anything, the more articles you have edited, the less you should be allowed TO edit.  Wiki keeps all the edits, so just go back and look at the poor mediation wiki has done, the favoritism, the palpable bias, it isn&#8217;t a &#8220;community&#8221;, it is a mob.  </p>
<p>And like most mobs, it isn&#8217;t very intelligent or rational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
