<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Crash &#8211; Come on Please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/</link>
	<description>Opinion from Silicon Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: motionocom</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-38167</link>
		<dc:creator>motionocom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-38167</guid>
		<description>This ia a very good article, however i believe Google deserves their dominance on the internet, without google can you imagine how bad the internet would have been? we would still be using sites such as altavista, infoseek, and never really finding what we are looking for while at the same time being exposed to all sorts of pop ups and heavyly animated and annoying ads and so on, Google took internet to the next level and they know it, with the power and resources they have they will make internet even better, Of course competition is healthy and Google should not purchase everything right and left such as Youtube and DoubleClick, but at the same time their purchase of Youtube and Doubleclick gives rise to new companies becoming more passionate about the internet, for example when Google purchased Youtube for 1.6billion, suddenly 1000&#039;s of new video sharing sites started popping up, such as Jumpcut by Yahoo, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/13/nokias-youtube-features-in-action/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Motiono.Com&lt;/a&gt;, Metacafe, and many others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ia a very good article, however i believe Google deserves their dominance on the internet, without google can you imagine how bad the internet would have been? we would still be using sites such as altavista, infoseek, and never really finding what we are looking for while at the same time being exposed to all sorts of pop ups and heavyly animated and annoying ads and so on, Google took internet to the next level and they know it, with the power and resources they have they will make internet even better, Of course competition is healthy and Google should not purchase everything right and left such as Youtube and DoubleClick, but at the same time their purchase of Youtube and Doubleclick gives rise to new companies becoming more passionate about the internet, for example when Google purchased Youtube for 1.6billion, suddenly 1000&#8217;s of new video sharing sites started popping up, such as Jumpcut by Yahoo, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/13/nokias-youtube-features-in-action/" rel="nofollow">Motiono.Com</a>, Metacafe, and many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Pang</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-29110</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Pang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-29110</guid>
		<description>Google is an innovative company, it will crash when it stop pumping out new stuff. But right now, it&#039;s still expanding its business in every corner of the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is an innovative company, it will crash when it stop pumping out new stuff. But right now, it&#8217;s still expanding its business in every corner of the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wall</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13917</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13917</guid>
		<description>I can see the google stock price flattening, but crashing? Judging from the changes in the advertising world I think the crash will be in 30-second TV spots, magazines and other media that Google will continue to bleed. I&#039;m surprised they don&#039;t do a 10 for 1 split to make it &quot;feel&quot; less inflated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the google stock price flattening, but crashing? Judging from the changes in the advertising world I think the crash will be in 30-second TV spots, magazines and other media that Google will continue to bleed. I&#8217;m surprised they don&#8217;t do a 10 for 1 split to make it &#8220;feel&#8221; less inflated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Terenzio</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Terenzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>Nice John,

It&#039;s rare that I disagree with Dave Winer on tech related posts, but this one didn&#039;t seem right to me either, even if there is some truth to it, as you pointed out.

I&#039;m glad I found your blog. I was aware of your name and of PodTech for a while now, but it takes a link from DW to get me to subscribe. Weird and cool in a way since it was a post we both contended.

I&#039;m subscribed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice John,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s rare that I disagree with Dave Winer on tech related posts, but this one didn&#8217;t seem right to me either, even if there is some truth to it, as you pointed out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I found your blog. I was aware of your name and of PodTech for a while now, but it takes a link from DW to get me to subscribe. Weird and cool in a way since it was a post we both contended.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m subscribed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scripting News for 11/29/2006 &#171; Scripting News Annex</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13722</link>
		<dc:creator>Scripting News for 11/29/2006 &#171; Scripting News Annex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13722</guid>
		<description>[...] John Furrier: &#8220;Saying that startups will burst when Google crashes is like saying that increase in interest rates will burst the housing bubble.&#8221;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Furrier: &#8220;Saying that startups will burst when Google crashes is like saying that increase in interest rates will burst the housing bubble.&#8221;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Furrier</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13708</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13708</guid>
		<description>Scott,
Great observation.  Alot of the bubblish behavior actually isn&#039;t coming from VCs but from existing media companies as they watch new companies and Google take over their &#039;turf&#039;.  The media ecosystem is under full assault and it (media ecosystem) will fall into balance via a highened M/A environment.  Add to the fact that major IP infrastructure innovation is around the corner.  The software side of the market has already had a makeover because of open source.  

It is one of the most fun times for an entrepreneur.  That is a conversation that I want to have with folks.

btw: congrats on your new book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
Great observation.  Alot of the bubblish behavior actually isn&#8217;t coming from VCs but from existing media companies as they watch new companies and Google take over their &#8216;turf&#8217;.  The media ecosystem is under full assault and it (media ecosystem) will fall into balance via a highened M/A environment.  Add to the fact that major IP infrastructure innovation is around the corner.  The software side of the market has already had a makeover because of open source.  </p>
<p>It is one of the most fun times for an entrepreneur.  That is a conversation that I want to have with folks.</p>
<p>btw: congrats on your new book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kirsner</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13693</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kirsner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/google-crash-come-on-please/#comment-13693</guid>
		<description>Great post, John. One additional observation, in the form of a parlor game... let&#039;s name all the companies who&#039;ve been big acquirers of Web 2.0 and digital media companies over the past year:

- Google (buying YouTube)
- Yahoo (buying Flickr, Jumpcut, etc.)
- Viacom/MTV (buying Atom Entertainment, iFilm)
- News Corp./Fox Interactive Media (buying MySpace)

If one or two of those companies saw their stock prices drop, and stopped doing as many acquisitions as they have been, the pressure on the others to acquire companies defensively would diminish. &lt;i&gt;Then&lt;/i&gt; who would all the Web 2.0 start-ups sell to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, John. One additional observation, in the form of a parlor game&#8230; let&#8217;s name all the companies who&#8217;ve been big acquirers of Web 2.0 and digital media companies over the past year:</p>
<p>- Google (buying YouTube)<br />
- Yahoo (buying Flickr, Jumpcut, etc.)<br />
- Viacom/MTV (buying Atom Entertainment, iFilm)<br />
- News Corp./Fox Interactive Media (buying MySpace)</p>
<p>If one or two of those companies saw their stock prices drop, and stopped doing as many acquisitions as they have been, the pressure on the others to acquire companies defensively would diminish. <i>Then</i> who would all the Web 2.0 start-ups sell to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
