<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Not Thinking Big Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/</link>
	<description>Opinion from Silicon Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29486</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29486</guid>
		<description>They could easily dominate the CDN space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could easily dominate the CDN space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Furrier</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29485</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29485</guid>
		<description>Daniela,
Google has to be completely focused on the enterprise for sure.. they are taking a strong approach in the enterprise

Rick: I think that that might be too small for them unless it was a national or global brand... print is morphing to online and those offline franchises better be thinking of ways to integrate online...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniela,<br />
Google has to be completely focused on the enterprise for sure.. they are taking a strong approach in the enterprise</p>
<p>Rick: I think that that might be too small for them unless it was a national or global brand&#8230; print is morphing to online and those offline franchises better be thinking of ways to integrate online&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Calvert</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29482</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Calvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29482</guid>
		<description>How about taking over a major newspaper or magazine publisher John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about taking over a major newspaper or magazine publisher John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniela barbosa</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29481</link>
		<dc:creator>daniela barbosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/03/16/google-not-thinking-big-enough/#comment-29481</guid>
		<description>Continue to develop and innovate around Enterprise solutions. Test it in the consumer space and then deliver enterprise grade solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continue to develop and innovate around Enterprise solutions. Test it in the consumer space and then deliver enterprise grade solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
