<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple saved by record earnings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/apple-saved-by-record-earnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/apple-saved-by-record-earnings/</link>
	<description>Opinion from Silicon Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gwhiz</title>
		<link>http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/apple-saved-by-record-earnings/#comment-34846</link>
		<dc:creator>gwhiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://podtech.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/apple-saved-by-record-earnings/#comment-34846</guid>
		<description>Wonder what kind of deeper scrutiny Murrell would prefer to see!? Let&#039;s say Apple&#039;s earnings HAVE deflected attention (for now). Then iPhone will deflect attention further in July. And Leopard in June and who knows what else inbetween! I don&#039;t see that happening. No one gets a pass with federal prosecutors/investigators.

The SEC doesn&#039;t give a rat&#039;s behind about earnings, product releases and the like. Their investigators are bulldogs not easily deterred and if there is a murky bottom to the matter... they&#039;ll drain the lake or dredge until they find what they sense is there. But, if they come out and say &quot;This deal is over. Jobs is cleared and Heinen is our sole subject of interest...&quot; Well, it sucks to be in the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what kind of deeper scrutiny Murrell would prefer to see!? Let&#8217;s say Apple&#8217;s earnings HAVE deflected attention (for now). Then iPhone will deflect attention further in July. And Leopard in June and who knows what else inbetween! I don&#8217;t see that happening. No one gets a pass with federal prosecutors/investigators.</p>
<p>The SEC doesn&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s behind about earnings, product releases and the like. Their investigators are bulldogs not easily deterred and if there is a murky bottom to the matter&#8230; they&#8217;ll drain the lake or dredge until they find what they sense is there. But, if they come out and say &#8220;This deal is over. Jobs is cleared and Heinen is our sole subject of interest&#8230;&#8221; Well, it sucks to be in the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
